Trump picks Pam Bondi for US Attorney General after Gaetz withdraws

Her resume contrasts with that of Gaetz, who has little of the traditional experience expected of an attorney general.

Bondi would likely face less opposition from senators involved in the confirmation process compared with Gaetz.

Trump announced his pick of Bondi on social media, praising her for her prosecutorial experience and saying she was tough on crime as Florida’s first female attorney general.

Trump, who was elected on Nov. 5 despite being the subject of multiple criminal investigations from US and state prosecutors, including a felony conviction in the state of New York, said Bondi would end the politicisation of federal prosecutions.

“For too long, the partisan Department of Justice has been weaponised against me and other Republicans – Not anymore,” Trump said.

“Pam will refocus the DOJ to its intended purpose of fight Crime, and Making America Safe Again.”

Bondi, a Trump loyalist, is expected to carry out Trump’s policy agenda.

During the Republican U.S. president-elect’s first term, Trump was infuriated by what he called an obstructive Justice Department, including attorneys general Jeff Sessions, who allowed a probe into alleged Russia, and Bill Barr, who publicly refuted his false claims his 2020 election loss was the result of fraud.

The broad contours of Trump’s plans for the Justice Department have been communicated through Trump’s own public statements, as well as statements by Mark Paoletta, a conservative attorney leading the policy planning for the Justice Department, and in interviews and public forums with former department attorneys.

Federal prosecutors will likely be directed to prioritize illegal immigration cases. Cities that hope to receive a slice of the department’s more-than-$291 million justice assistance grant programme will likely have to agree to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement.

The Civil Rights Division is expected to shift its focus away from police accountability toward defending religious freedom and filing legal challenges against government and private sector diversity, equity and inclusion programmes.
-Reuters
-NewStraitsTime